AI-Powered Universal Comparison Engine

Web browsers: Brave Browser 2.0 vs. Google Chrome 130

Quick Verdict

Brave Browser 2.0 is a strong choice for users prioritizing privacy and built-in security features, along with cryptocurrency integration. Google Chrome 130 remains a solid option for users deeply integrated with the Google ecosystem and who value a vast extension library and seamless synchronization, but it requires more attention to privacy settings and resource management.

Key features – Side-by-Side

AttributeBrave Browser 2.0Google Chrome 130
Privacy FeaturesShields block ads, trackers, fingerprinting, and cookies; prevents third-party cookies and scripts; removes tracking parameters from URLs; upgrades to HTTPS; fingerprint randomization.Integrates OS-level privacy controls, making users more aware of camera and microphone permissions. Relies on user settings and extensions for ad and tracker blocking.
Security FeaturesBuilt-in ad and tracker blocking; HTTPS upgrades; script blocking; Private Windows with Tor.Includes 17 security fixes, addressing vulnerabilities. Security by default, protecting from dangerous sites. Uses site isolation, sandboxing, and predictive phishing protection. Regular updates every six weeks.
Resource UsageEfficient resource usage; ad blocking saves processing power; high CPU and memory usage can occur.Resource-intensive, especially with many tabs. Introduced performance detection tools and memory saver modes (Moderate, Balanced, and Maximum) to manage performance and memory usage.
Page Loading SpeedFaster page loads due to ad and tracker blocking.Known for its speed and quick page loading times.
Extension Availability and CompatibilitySupports most Chrome extensions; supports Manifest V2 extensions until at least June 2025.Extensive library of extensions available. Generally compatible with popular browser extensions.
Customization OptionsThemes; toolbar customization; new tab page customization; theme color changes.Allows customization of themes, colors, and backgrounds. Customization options are available via a side panel.
Cross-Platform CompatibilityWindows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS.Available on Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS.
User Interface and Ease of UseSimple and functional interface; clean and minimalist default theme.User interface has undergone a Material Design refresh, with slightly rounded tabs and a white background. Customization options are available via a side panel.
Synchronization CapabilitiesSync v2 across desktop and Android; syncs bookmarks, passwords, autofill, history, tabs, extensions, themes, settings, and apps; client-side encryption.Offers seamless syncing of bookmarks, history, passwords, and extensions across devices when signed in with a Google account.
Built-in VPN or ProxyBuilt-in VPN; Private Windows with Tor.No built-in VPN or proxy.
Cryptocurrency Wallet IntegrationBuilt-in crypto wallet; supports Bitcoin, Ethereum, BAT, Ethereum, EVM-compatible chains, Solana, and Filecoin; in-browser trading; partnering with Cardano.No cryptocurrency wallet integration.
Developer ToolsRivals Chrome and Firefox; accessible via menu or shortcuts; inspect, debug, and analyze web pages.Includes improvements to DevTools, such as AI assistance for debugging, network panel improvements, and memory panel updates.

Overall Comparison

Brave: Built-in ad & tracker blocking, crypto wallet. Chrome: Extensive extensions, seamless Google sync, 17 security fixes.

Pros and Cons

Brave Browser 2.0

Pros:
  • Strong privacy features
  • Built-in ad and tracker blocking
  • Cross-platform compatibility
  • Cryptocurrency wallet integration
  • Customizable interface
  • Supports Chrome extensions
  • Efficient resource usage
Cons:
  • High CPU and memory usage can occur
  • Ad blocking can cause high CPU and memory usage

Google Chrome 130

Pros:
  • Extensive library of extensions
  • Cross-platform compatibility
  • Seamless data synchronization
  • Fast page loading speed
  • Customizable user interface
  • Security by default
  • Improvements to DevTools
Cons:
  • Resource-intensive
  • Default privacy settings favor data collection
  • No built-in VPN or proxy
  • No cryptocurrency wallet integration

User Experiences and Feedback