AI-Powered Universal Comparison Engine

Vpn services: Private Internet Access (PIA) vs. Atlas VPN

Quick Verdict

Both Private Internet Access (PIA) and Atlas VPN offer competitive VPN services with strengths in different areas. PIA stands out with its vast server network, independently audited no-logs policy, and extensive security features. Atlas VPN is noted for its user-friendly interface and generally quick customer support. The choice between them depends on the user's specific needs and priorities.

Key features – Side-by-Side

AttributePrivate Internet Access (PIA)Atlas VPN
Server Network Size and Distribution700+ servers across 42+ countries in the Americas, Europe, Asia, and Australia; limited coverage in Africa.
Encryption ProtocolsWireGuard and IKEv2/IPSec protocols. AES-256 encryption and ChaCha20 with WireGuard. Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS). OpenVPN not supported.
Logging PolicyNo-logs policy, but minimal data is collected for analytics and account management. The no-logs policy has not been independently audited, but security audits of their infrastructure have been performed.
Simultaneous Device ConnectionsUnlimited simultaneous connections.
Speed Performance (Download/Upload)Good download speeds with WireGuard. Download speeds slightly above baseline speeds, while upload speeds may decrease significantly.
Kill Switch FunctionalityIncludes a kill switch feature that cuts off internet traffic if the VPN connection drops.
Torrenting Support (P2P)Supports P2P file sharing and torrenting on its servers. P2P is allowed on all servers, including free servers.
Streaming Service Compatibility (e.g., Netflix, Hulu)Unblocks Netflix in several countries, Hulu, Amazon Prime Video, and Max. May also work with BBC iPlayer. Disney Plus unblocking has been inconsistent. Offers streaming-optimized servers in some locations.
Customer Support Availability and Responsiveness24/7 live chat for premium users, ticket submission, FAQs, and a knowledge base. Generally quick and polite responses.
Price and Subscription OptionsFree plan with limited server locations and a 5GB monthly data limit. Premium plans include monthly, annual, and 3-year subscriptions. Longer subscriptions offer lower monthly prices.
User Interface and Ease of UseUser-friendly app, suitable for beginners. Easy to set up and use on different devices and operating systems.
Security Features (e.g., ad blocking, malware protection)Data breach monitor, malware blocker, and ad blocker. SafeSwap servers that regularly rotate your IP address. Passed DNS leak tests, proving it can hide your IP address.

Overall Comparison

PIA: 25,000+ servers, Audited No-Logs Policy, $2.03/month; Atlas VPN: 700+ servers, Unaudited No-Logs Policy, Free Plan Available

Pros and Cons

Private Internet Access (PIA)

Pros:
  • Large server network
  • Strong encryption protocols
  • Strict no-logs policy
  • Unlimited device connections
  • Good speeds with WireGuard
  • Effective kill switch
  • Full torrenting support
  • Unblocks major streaming services
  • Affordable pricing
  • Easy to use interface
  • MACE ad blocker
  • Split tunneling
  • Multi-hop connections
  • Obfuscation
  • IPv6 and DNS leak protection
  • RAM-only servers
Cons:
  • Inconsistent speeds
  • Hit-or-miss streaming access
  • Slow customer support response times (in some cases)

Atlas VPN

Pros:
  • Good speed and stability, especially when using the WireGuard protocol
  • Unlimited simultaneous connections
  • Supports P2P file sharing and torrenting
  • Can unblock popular streaming services like Netflix and Hulu
  • User-friendly app, suitable for beginners
  • Includes a kill switch feature
  • Offers 24/7 live chat support for premium users
  • Includes security features like a data breach monitor, malware blocker, and ad blocker
  • SafeSwap servers that regularly rotate your IP address
Cons:
  • Limited server coverage in Africa
  • OpenVPN protocol is not supported
  • No-logs policy has not been independently audited
  • Upload speeds may decrease significantly
  • Disney Plus unblocking may be inconsistent

User Experiences and Feedback