AI-Powered Universal Comparison Engine

Startups: Project Starline 3D Calling vs. Axiom Space Station

Quick Verdict

Project Starline 3D Calling and Axiom Space Station cater to vastly different needs. Starline aims to revolutionize communication by creating realistic, face-to-face interactions, while Axiom Space Station is focused on building a commercial space platform for research, manufacturing, and habitation in low Earth orbit. The choice depends entirely on the specific application: immersive communication versus space-based services.

Key features – Side-by-Side

AttributeProject Starline 3D CallingAxiom Space Station
Technology UsedCombines hardware and software advancements in 3D imaging, AI, spatial audio, and real-time compression. Utilizes high-resolution cameras and depth sensors to capture a real-time 3D model of the person. Employs AI algorithms for processing images, motion capture, and facial expression recognition. Uses a light field display to project 3D images with depth, creating a sense of volume without requiring glasses or headsets. AI-driven volumetric video model transforms 2D video streams into realistic 3D experiences.Canadarm3 technology for robotic interfaces, Cloud technology-enabled orbital data center, Optical Intersatellite Links (OISLs) for high data rates, AI and machine learning capabilities, Edge computing for data processing in orbit, Touch-screen communications panels in crew quarters, Siemens Xcelerator portfolio for digital threads and twins, High-speed cellular network capabilities in spacesuits (with Nokia)
Spatial Audio QualityIncorporates spatial audio to create a realistic soundscape, enhancing the feeling of being in the same room.Not available
3D Image Resolution and ClarityHigh-resolution cameras and depth sensors capture detailed 3D images. AI enhances images for a seamless experience. The system aims for photorealistic representation.Not available
Network Bandwidth RequirementsUses real-time compression techniques to facilitate smooth video calls, but specific bandwidth requirements aren't consistently mentioned.Optical links to support up to 10 gigabits-per-second data throughput, Future nodes to integrate emerging 10Gbps+ OISL and space-to-ground optical communications
Real-time Communication LatencyMaintains remarkably low latency, ensuring natural conversation flow.Aim to reduce delays associated with orbital data processing by using Earth-independent cloud storage and edge processing, Targeting lower latency and higher availability cloud capabilities, Round trip delay to ISS is usually 3-6 seconds
User Experience and Ease of UseAims to replicate face-to-face interaction, including gestures and eye contact. The technology fades into the background. Designed to be more natural and intuitive.Focus on making it a comfortable, easy-to-use space station, Touch-screen communications panels in crew quarters
Scalability (Number of Concurrent Users)Not availableHab-1 module to provide quarters for four crew members, Hab-2 module to provide quarters for an additional four crew members
Security and Privacy FeaturesHas a policy for user privacy, and data protection is implemented. User permission is key for using the technology.Earth-independent endpoint detection and response for cybersecurity, Secure space-based data processing, Multi-factor authentication and cyber intrusion detection and response
Integration with Existing Communication PlatformsDesigned to integrate with existing video conferencing platforms like Google Meet and Zoom.Axiom Space is working with Kepler Communications and Skyloom to integrate high data rate Optical Intersatellite Links (OISLs) on Axiom Station, ODC nodes will feature high-speed, 2.5Gbps-capable optical links to other Kepler Communications optical relay assets in LEO
Construction TimelinePrototypes were found in Google offices across the U.S.Targeting 2027 for the launch of the first module (PPTM), Targeting late 2020s to early 2030s for station completion, PPTM scheduled to launch to the ISS no earlier than 2027, Hab-1 expected to launch no earlier than 2028, Airlock Module (AL) expected to launch in the late 2020s, Research and Manufacturing Facility Module with Earth Observatory (RMF) expected to launch in the early 2030s, Axiom Station could become a free flyer as early as 2028
Habitability and Life Support SystemsNot applicableHab-1 will provide quarters for four crew members, Hab-2 will provide quarters for an additional four crew members, Axiom Power Tower expands on Axiom Station's environmental control and life support (ECLSS) capabilities
Research and Manufacturing CapabilitiesGoogle partners with HP to produce hardware for Beam.Hab-1 will accommodate research and manufacturing applications, Research and Manufacturing Facility Module with Earth Observatory (RMF) will provide access to the microgravity environment for research, product development, process improvement, and space manufacturing, Dedicated Research & Manufacturing Facility will provide state-of-the-art capabilities to develop products and processes that cannot be created under the influence of gravity
PriceNot availableNot available

Overall Comparison

Project Starline: Aims for photorealistic 3D image representation and low latency. Axiom Space Station: Up to 10 Gbps data throughput via optical links, 3-6 seconds round trip delay to ISS, Quarters for 8 crew members.

Pros and Cons

Project Starline 3D Calling

Pros:
  • Fosters a stronger sense of presence
  • Creates a realistic, hologram-like representation
  • Offers a more natural and engaging video call experience
  • Captures nuances in appearance and body movements
  • Low latency ensures natural conversation flow
  • Designed to be more natural and intuitive
Cons:
  • Specific bandwidth requirements are not detailed
  • Information on the specific number of concurrent users supported is not available

Axiom Space Station

Pros:
  • Commercial focus for services and products in low Earth orbit
  • Scalable, cloud technology-enabled, commercial orbital data center
  • Earth-independent endpoint detection and response for enhanced cybersecurity
  • Canadarm3 technology for robotic interfaces
  • Dedicated Research & Manufacturing Facility with state-of-the-art capabilities
  • Provides access to the unique microgravity environment
Cons:
  • No major disadvantages reported.

User Experiences and Feedback