Compare Products, Services & More

Public transit systems: New York City Subway (Second Avenue Subway Extension) vs. Paris Métro (Grand Paris Express)

Quick Verdict

The Grand Paris Express is a much larger and more ambitious project than the Second Avenue Subway extension, with a higher projected ridership and more extensive network expansion.

Comparison of Public transit systemsNew York City Subway (Second Avenue Subway Extension) vs. Paris Métro (Grand Paris Express)

Key features – Side-by-Side

AttributeNew York City Subway (Second Avenue Subway Extension)Paris Métro (Grand Paris Express)
Projected Ridership (daily)110,000 (Phase 2 alone), 300,000 (Phases 1 & 2)3,000,000
Construction Cost (total)$6.99 billion (Phase 2 budget), nearly $7.7 billion (including financing)Approximately $47.7 billion
Number of New Stations368
Service Frequency (peak)Every 3 minutesEvery 2-3 minutes (on some lines)
Accessibility FeaturesADA-accessible stations100% accessible
Project Completion TimelineSeptember 2032Around 2030

Overall Comparison

Ridership: Paris wins; Cost: Paris higher; Stations: Paris wins; Completion: Similar timelines

Pros and Cons

New York City Subway (Second Avenue Subway Extension)

Pros:
  • Reduces crowding on the Lexington Avenue Line
  • Improved air quality
  • Shorter commute times for some passengers
  • ADA-accessible stations
  • Direct connection to Lexington Avenue line and Metro-North Railroad
  • Community input in planning and design
  • Local hiring target for East Harlem residents
Cons:
  • No major disadvantages reported.

Paris Métro (Grand Paris Express)

Pros:
  • Improved accessibility with 100% accessible stations and trains
  • Significant reduction in commute times
  • Extensive integration with existing transit network
  • Environmentally friendly design with reduced carbon emissions
  • Technological innovations such as driverless trains
Cons:
  • Project delays
  • Cost escalations

User Experiences and Feedback