Compare Products, Services & More

Motorcycles > Kawasaki Ninja 400 vs. BMW R 1300 GS

Last updated:

The Kawasaki Ninja 400 and BMW R 1300 GS represent vastly different segments of the motorcycle market. The Ninja 400 is an entry-level sportbike, while the R 1300 GS is a high-performance adventure touring machine. This comparison highlights the key differences in performance, features, and intended use.

This comparison analyzes real-world performance, user feedback, and key differentiators to help you make an informed decision.

Quick Verdict

For riders seeking raw power, advanced technology, and adventure capabilities, the BMW R 1300 GS is the clear choice. However, the Kawasaki Ninja 400 presents an accessible, lightweight, and affordable option for novice riders or those prioritizing urban maneuverability.

Who Should Choose Which?

Choose Kawasaki Ninja 400 if:

Beginner riders, urban commuters, and those seeking an affordable and nimble sportbike.

Choose BMW R 1300 GS if:

Experienced riders, adventure enthusiasts, and those requiring a powerful and versatile motorcycle for long-distance travel and off-road exploration.

Comparison of MotorcyclesKawasaki Ninja 400 vs. BMW R 1300 GS

Key features – Side-by-Side

AttributeKawasaki Ninja 400BMW R 1300 GS
Engine Displacement (cc)3991300
Horsepower (HP)44.7/49145
Torque (Nm)37/38149
Wet Weight (kg)168237
Seat Height (mm)785850 (variable)
Fuel Capacity (L)1419
Riding ModesNo riding modesEco, Rain, Road, Enduro (standard), Dynamic, Dynamic Pro, Enduro Pro (optional)

Overall Comparison

Ninja 400: 44.7 HP, 168 kg | R 1300 GS: 145 HP, 237 kg | Ninja 400: Urban focus | R 1300 GS: Adventure touring

Pros and Cons

Kawasaki Ninja 400

Pros:
  • Increased performance at all RPMs
  • Smooth and predictable engine response
  • Brisk acceleration
  • Good fuel economy (25-27 kmpl)
  • Comfortable seat for urban and weekend riding
  • Strong stopping power with available ABS
  • Nimble and easy to handle due to lightweight trellis frame
  • High-grade multi-function dash instrumentation
Cons:
  • Seat may firm up after 90 minutes
  • Taller riders might want more wind protection at highway speeds
  • No riding modes

BMW R 1300 GS

Pros:
  • Responsive engine with ample torque
  • Smooth, direct power delivery
  • Suitable for on and off-road riding
  • Variable seat height adjustment
  • Strong and reliable stopping power
  • Integral ABS Pro enhances safety
  • Dynamic ESA effectively absorbs bumps and maintains stability
  • Agile and manageable handling
  • Adjustable sport windscreen for variable wind and weather protection
  • Crisp TFT display
Cons:
  • No major disadvantages reported.

User Experiences and Feedback

Frequently Asked Questions

Which bike is better for beginners?

The Kawasaki Ninja 400 is more suitable for beginners due to its lighter weight, lower seat height, and manageable power delivery.

Which bike is better for long-distance touring?

The BMW R 1300 GS is better equipped for long-distance touring with its larger fuel capacity, comfortable riding position, and advanced features like riding modes and electronic suspension.

Sources & Citations

Information gathered through AI-assisted web search and analysis. Last updated: August 2025

Methodology & Transparency

Our comparison methodology combines multiple data sources to provide comprehensive, unbiased analysis:

  • Data Collection: We gather information from official specifications, user reviews, and independent testing
  • AI-Assisted Analysis: Advanced AI helps process large amounts of data while maintaining accuracy
  • Human Oversight: All comparisons are reviewed for accuracy and relevance
  • Regular Updates: Content is refreshed to reflect new information and user feedback
  • Bias Mitigation: We strive for objectivity by considering multiple perspectives and sources

Versusly.ai uses AI-assisted content generation combined with human oversight to deliver comprehensive comparisons. We are transparent about our process and continuously work to improve accuracy and usefulness.