Compare Products, Services & More

Medical centers: Cedars-Sinai Medical Center vs. Mayo Clinic

Quick Verdict

Both Cedars-Sinai and Mayo Clinic are excellent hospitals with strong reputations. Mayo Clinic stands out for its higher patient satisfaction scores, extensive research activity, and wider geographic reach. Cedars-Sinai is notable for its efficient system and personalized patient services, but has had some past issues with infection control.

Comparison of Medical centersCedars-Sinai Medical Center vs. Mayo Clinic

Key features – Side-by-Side

AttributeCedars-Sinai Medical CenterMayo Clinic
Hospital Size (Number of Beds)915 licensed beds (other sources state 877 or 886)Rochester, Minnesota: 2,059 beds (Saint Marys Campus: 1,265 beds, Methodist Campus: 794 beds); Phoenix, Arizona: 368 licensed beds; Barron, Wisconsin: Not specified
Specialty RankingsNationally recognized in cardiac care, cancer treatment, orthopedics, neurosciences, transplantation services, and women's health. Ranked among the top performing hospitals in the U.S. by U.S. News & World Report.#1 in Minnesota and Arizona; Top-ranked in 13 specialties, including #1 in Diabetes & Endocrinology and Gastroenterology (GI) & GI Surgery; Nationally ranked in 13 adult and 10 pediatric specialties
Patient Satisfaction ScoresOverall rating of 91 out of 100. Customer Satisfaction score of 47. 93 out of 100 patients would recommend the hospital.Five-star ratings for patient experience; Likelihood of recommending improved from 82.9% in 2017 to 87.5% in 2021; Overall rating of 95 out of 100, 96 out of 100 would recommend
Technology and EquipmentState-of-the-art operating rooms, comprehensive cancer center, and dedicated heart institute.Da Vinci Surgical System (potentially via robotic pilot programs), Advanced imaging, Proton beam therapy program, State-of-the-art electronic patient flow system in the Emergency Department
Research ActivityLeading institute for research funding from the National Institutes of Health. Total research expenditure in 2020 201321 was $252 million. In fiscal year 2021, received $93 million in funding from the National Institutes of Health. Research focuses on stem cell biology, immunology, neuroscience and genetics.5,272 research personnel, 948 physicians involved in research, 321 scientific faculty, 27 core research laboratories, 9,319 active Institutional Review Board-approved human research studies, 1,200 new Institutional Review Board-approved human research studies in 2023, 11,220 peer-reviewed publications, 5,943 active grants and contracts
Teaching Hospital AffiliationAffiliated with the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA.Mayo Clinic Hospital 2013 Rochester is a teaching hospital; Affiliated with Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine
Geographic Accessibility/LocationLocated in Los Angeles, California, on a 24-acre site.Campuses in Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota; Mayo Clinic Health System serves communities in southern Minnesota, western Wisconsin, and northern Iowa; Rochester, Minnesota: Downtown campus with over 30 buildings, Saint Marys Campus 10 blocks west of downtown, Methodist Campus in downtown Rochester; Phoenix and Scottsdale, Arizona
Insurance Coverage AcceptanceContracted with more than 100 types of insurance plans, including private insurance, HMO, PPO, POS, EPO, Medicare and Medi-Cal.Accepts a wide range of insurance plans, both domestic and international; Works with major national carriers and regional plans; Accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and TRICARE; Contracted with Aetna, Blue Cross Blue Shield, Cigna, Humana, and UnitedHealthcare; Group Health Cooperative, Compcare, and ContinuUs are accepted for non-emergent care at Mayo Clinic Health System; Accepts most out-of-state plans for urgent or emergent care
Emergency Room Wait TimesEstimated wait time of 10-15 minutes.Not available
Availability of Clinical TrialsHundreds of clinical trials underway, including approximately 140 cancer clinical trials.Hundreds of cancer clinical trials at campuses in Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota, and in the Midwest; Thousands of active clinical trials and research studies
Infection RatesPoor score for preventing catheter related infection and C. Diff in 2014. Ranked well in preventing blood, urinary tract, and MRSA infections in 2019.Magnet recognition associated with lower risk of hospital infections; Mayo Clinic in Florida and Arizona outperformed benchmarks for hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections
Awards and AccreditationsSix consecutive Magnet recognitions for nursing excellence from the ANCC. First Southern California hospital to earn Magnet designation in 2000.Magnet Recognition for nursing excellence; Five-star rating from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS); Recognized as a five-star hospital based on patient experience surveys; Leapfrog Hospital Safety Grade "A"

Overall Comparison

Mayo Clinic: 95/100 overall rating, 96/100 would recommend; Cedars-Sinai: 91/100 overall rating, 93/100 would recommend.

Pros and Cons

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Pros:
  • Advanced technology and facilities
  • Nationally recognized specialties
  • High patient recommendation rate
  • Leading research institute
  • Teaching hospital affiliation
  • Wide insurance coverage acceptance
  • Efficient system from arrival to discharge
  • Personalized patient services
  • Multilingual staff and interpreter services
  • Compassionate care
  • Coordination of care with other specialists or departments
  • Instructions for follow-up care after discharge
Cons:
  • Poor score for preventing certain infections in the past (2014)
  • Customer Satisfaction score of 47

Mayo Clinic

Pros:
  • Top-ranked in many specialties
  • High patient satisfaction scores
  • Advanced technology and equipment
  • Extensive research activity
  • Teaching hospital affiliation
  • Wide geographic accessibility
  • Accepts a wide range of insurance plans
  • Availability of numerous clinical trials
  • Lower risk of hospital infections (Magnet recognition)
  • Magnet Recognition for nursing excellence
  • High percentage of patients would recommend
  • Patient-centered approach
  • Cross-specialty coordination
Cons:
  • Emergency Room Wait Times information not available
  • Specific practices related to cultural or religious needs was not found
  • Information on ease of scheduling was not found

User Experiences and Feedback