AI-Powered Universal Comparison Engine

Language models: Mistral AI Titan vs. Llama 4

Quick Verdict

Both Mistral AI Titan and Llama 4 are powerful language models with distinct strengths. Mistral AI Titan offers flexibility with both open-source and proprietary options, while Llama 4 emphasizes open-source fine-tuning and strong multilingual performance. The choice depends on specific use cases, licensing requirements, and desired inference speed.

Key features – Side-by-Side

AttributeMistral AI TitanLlama 4
Model Size (Number of Parameters)Varies; Mistral Large 2: 123 billion, Codestral: 22 billion, Mistral Nemo: 12B, Mistral 7B: 7 billionLlama 4 Scout: 17 billion active parameters, 16 experts, and 109 billion total parameters. Llama 4 Maverick: 17 billion active parameters, 128 experts, and 400 billion total parameters. Llama 4 Behemoth: 288 billion active parameters, 16 experts, and nearly 2 trillion total parameters.
Context Window LengthMistral Large: 32K tokens, Mixtral 8x22B: 64k, Some reports mention 8K sequence lengthLlama 4 Scout: 10 million tokens. Llama 4 Maverick: 1 million tokens.
Training Data Size and CompositionCodestral: over 80 programming languages (Python, Java, C++, JavaScript, etc.)Trained on more than 30 trillion tokens. Includes diverse text, image, and video datasets. Llama 4 Scout was pretrained on ~40 trillion tokens and Llama 4 Maverick was pretrained on ~22 trillion tokens of multimodal data. Mix of publicly available, licensed data, and data from Meta's products/services (Instagram, Facebook). Pre-training data cutoff is August 2024.
Availability (Open Source vs. Proprietary)Both open-source and proprietary models available; some under Apache 2.0 licenseMeta refers to Llama 4 models as open source.
Licensing Terms and Usage RestrictionsModels like Mistral 7B and Mixtral 8x7B: Apache License 2.0 (personal and commercial use); some licenses prohibit commercial use; attribution generally requiredLlama 4 Community License Agreement. Grants a royalty-free, worldwide right to use, modify, reproduce, and distribute the models. Requires displaying "Built with Llama". If monthly active users exceed 700 million, a special license from Meta is required. Adherence to the Acceptable Use Policy is mandatory, prohibiting use for harmful activities. The rights granted under Section 1(a) of the Llama 4 Community License Agreement are not being granted to you if you are an individual domiciled in, or a company with a principal place of business in, the European Union with respect to any multimodal models included in Llama 4. This restriction does not apply to end users of a product or service that incorporates any such multimodal models.
Inference Speed (Latency)Mistral Tiny LLM: <100ms for standard queries; Mixtral 8x7B: 6x faster than Llama 2 70BMixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture activates only a subset of parameters per input, allowing Scout and Maverick to deliver high performance while keeping inference costs low. The number of active parameters on a given token is always 17B. This reduces latencies on inference and training.
Fine-tuning Capabilities and Ease of UseFine-tuning API via La Plateforme; `mistral-finetune` codebase; Azure AI FoundryLlama 4 enables open source fine-tuning efforts by pre-training on 200 languages. Developers may fine-tune Llama 4 models for languages beyond the 12 supported languages provided they comply with the Llama 4 Community License and the Acceptable Use Policy.
Multilingual Support (Number of Languages)Mistral Large: English, French, Spanish, German, Italian; Mistral Nemo: over 100 languagesPre-trained on data spanning over 200 languages. Includes over 100 languages with over 1 billion tokens each. Strong multilingual performance, with 10x increase in non-English tokens compared to Llama 3. Supports 12 languages: Arabic, English, French, German, Hindi, Indonesian, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish, Tagalog, Thai, and Vietnamese.
Code Generation Performance (Benchmarks)Codestral: supports over 80 programming languages; Codestral 25.01: 86.6% on Python-focused HumanEvalLlama 4 Maverick excels in coding tasks and logical reasoning. High accuracy in structured code generation. MBPP: Maverick's 77.6 pass@1 outperforms Llama 3.1 405B (74.4).
Reasoning and Logic Performance (Benchmarks)Mistral Large: top-tier reasoning; Magistral: reasoning in European languagesLlama 4 Maverick demonstrates strong general reasoning, close to GPT-4o. MMLU Pro: 80.5. GPQA Diamond: 69.8.
Hallucination Rate and FactualityAmazon Bedrock Knowledge Bases can decrease hallucinations and improve accuracyLow hallucination rate post-DPO.
Safety and Bias Mitigation TechniquesAmazon Bedrock Guardrails can filter harmful content; techniques to filter/mitigate biased training dataMetaP training technique to reliably set critical model hyper-parameters. Trained to avoid generating harmful content.
PriceNot availableNot available
RatingsNot availableoverall:Not available, performance:Not available

Overall Comparison

Mistral AI Titan: Codestral 25.01 achieves 86.6% on Python-focused HumanEval. Llama 4: Maverick's 77.6 pass@1 on MBPP outperforms Llama 3.1 405B (74.4). Llama 4 Maverick achieves 80.5 on MMLU Pro and 69.8 on GPQA Diamond.

Pros and Cons

Mistral AI Titan

Pros:
  • Offers both open-source and proprietary models
  • Models available under the Apache 2.0 license allowing personal and commercial use (with attribution)
  • Fast inference speed (Mistral Tiny LLM <100ms)
  • Fine-tuning capabilities through La Plateforme and Azure AI Foundry
  • Strong multilingual support (Mistral Large fluent in 5 languages, Mistral Nemo supports over 100)
  • Excellent code generation performance (Codestral)
  • Top-tier reasoning capabilities (Mistral Large)
  • Hallucination mitigation using Amazon Bedrock Knowledge Bases
  • Safety and bias mitigation techniques using Amazon Bedrock Guardrails
Cons:
  • Commercial use of some models requires a specific license
  • Some licenses prohibit using the model for commercial purposes
  • No information about the reported perplexity of each model on standard benchmark datasets

Llama 4

Pros:
  • Strong multilingual performance
  • Excels in coding tasks and logical reasoning
  • Low hallucination rate
  • Efficient inference due to MoE architecture
Cons:
  • Licensing restrictions for EU individuals/companies regarding multimodal models
  • Special license required for over 700 million monthly active users

User Experiences and Feedback