AI-Powered Universal Comparison Engine

Language models: Inflection AI Pi 3 vs. GroqSonic 1

Quick Verdict

GroqSonic 1 is better suited for applications requiring high-speed inference and large context windows, while Inflection AI Pi 3 is a better choice for applications prioritizing safety, ethical considerations, and strong reasoning abilities. The choice depends heavily on the specific needs and priorities of the user.

Key features – Side-by-Side

AttributeInflection AI Pi 3GroqSonic 1
Context Window Size (Tokens)8k (though one source mentions a limited context window of 1000 tokens)Groq's architecture allows for context windows from 10k to 100k tokens. Llama 3.3 70B model on Groq has an 8196 context length.
Training Data SizeVast datasets of deeply emotional conversations between real people and billions of lines of text on the open web.The size of the training data impacts a model's biases and performance in different domains. Unrepresentative data can lead to skewed and misleading responses.
Parameter Count13 billion (Inflection-2 is a 175 billion parameter model, potentially 400 billion)Models range in size from GPT-1 at 512 tokens, to the Llama models going from Llama 2 at 4,096 to Llama 3 at 8,192 all the way to 3.1 at 128,000.
Inference Speed (Tokens/Second)Inflection-2 is more cost-effective and faster in serving.Llama 3.3 70B has been benchmarked at 276 tokens per second on Groq. Groq claims speeds of over 1,200 tokens/sec with Llama 3 8B. GroqChat can generate 1200 tokens per second using Llama 3-8b with 8196 context length.
Finetuning CapabilitiesProprietary finetuning system using reinforcement learning from employee feedback.Finetuning can adapt a model to specific tasks and datasets. Fine-tuning can improve a model's code generation performance.
Multilingual Support (Number of Languages)YesSome models offer multilingual support, with Whisper Large v3 supporting 99+ languages.
Code Generation Performance (Pass@k)Inflection-2.5 demonstrated significant improvement in a test that comprised coding tasks.Models can be fine-tuned to improve code generation performance.
Reasoning Ability (e.g., MMLU score)Inflection-2.5 outperforms its predecessor on the MMLU benchmark and performs at the 85th percentile of human test-takers on the Physics GRE.MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) is a benchmark used to evaluate a model's reasoning capabilities across various subjects.
Hallucination RateNot availableModels can sometimes generate incorrect or nonsensical information.
API Availability & PricingYes, a commercial API is available. The pricing is $2.50 per 1 million input tokens and $10 per 1 million output tokens.Groq offers an inference API. Groq offers Llama 3.3 70B Versatile 128k at an input price of $0.59 per million tokens and an output price of $0.79 per million tokens. Groq is giving away five billion tokens per day for free.
Safety Measures & Bias MitigationDesigned to be a safer alternative, avoids harmful, abusive, or illegal topics. Employs 'empathetic fine-tuning'. Pi was launched to prevent bias.Safety measures are implemented to prevent models from generating harmful or inappropriate content. Safety measures include modification of packaging and labeling, and substituting chemicals with a lower toxicity profile.
Energy Efficiency (Inference Cost)Not availableEnergy consumption is a significant factor in AI.
PriceNot availableGroq offers Llama 3.3 70B Versatile 128k at an input price of $0.59 per million tokens and an output price of $0.79 per million tokens. Groq is giving away five billion tokens per day for free.
Pros
  • Safer alternative to other chatbots
  • Offers proprietary finetuning system
  • Multilingual support
  • API available
  • Improved coding performance with Inflection-2.5
  • Strong reasoning ability (Inflection-2.5)
  • Designed to prevent bias
  • High inference speeds due to Groq's LPU architecture
  • Large context window allows for better coherence and complex task management
  • API availability for inference
  • Free tokens being given away
Cons
  • Limited context window size mentioned in one source (1000 tokens)
  • Hallucination Rate not available
  • Energy Efficiency not available
  • Potential for overfitting with larger context windows
  • Training data can impact biases and performance
  • Models can sometimes generate incorrect or nonsensical information

Overall Comparison

GroqSonic 1: Up to 1200 tokens/sec inference speed, 8196 context length. Inflection AI Pi 3: 8k context window, $2.50/$10 per 1M input/output tokens.

Pros and Cons

Inflection AI Pi 3

Pros:
  • Safer alternative to other chatbots
  • Offers proprietary finetuning system
  • Multilingual support
  • API available
  • Improved coding performance with Inflection-2.5
  • Strong reasoning ability (Inflection-2.5)
  • Designed to prevent bias
Cons:
  • Limited context window size mentioned in one source (1000 tokens)
  • Hallucination Rate not available
  • Energy Efficiency not available

GroqSonic 1

Pros:
  • High inference speeds due to Groq's LPU architecture
  • Large context window allows for better coherence and complex task management
  • API availability for inference
  • Free tokens being given away
Cons:
  • Potential for overfitting with larger context windows
  • Training data can impact biases and performance
  • Models can sometimes generate incorrect or nonsensical information

User Experiences and Feedback