AI-Powered Universal Comparison Engine

Language models: Claude 5 vs. Llama 4

Quick Verdict

Llama 4 offers larger context windows and broader multilingual pre-training, making it suitable for tasks requiring extensive context and multilingual support. Claude 5 excels in reasoning and coding with a focus on safety, making it ideal for applications demanding high accuracy and ethical considerations. The choice depends on specific needs: Llama 4 for large-scale data processing and multilingual applications, and Claude 5 for reasoning-intensive and safety-critical tasks.

Key features – Side-by-Side

AttributeClaude 5Llama 4
Context Window Size200,000 tokens (approximately 150,000 words or over 500 pages). Some use cases expanding to 1 million tokens.Llama 4 Scout: 10 million tokens, Llama 4 Maverick: 1 million tokens
Maximum Token OutputThe context window covers both input and output tokens.Not specified in search results
Training Data SizeNot availableOver 30 trillion tokens, including diverse text, image, and video data
Finetuning CapabilitiesCan be fine-tuned using high-quality prompt-completion pairs. Fine-tuning Claude 3 Haiku is generally available in Amazon Bedrock.Enables open-source fine-tuning, pre-trained on 200 languages, uses techniques like LoRA for efficient fine-tuning
Multilingual SupportRobust multilingual capabilities with strong performance in zero-shot tasks across languages. Claude 3.5 supports over 30 languages and maintains consistent relative performance across both widely-spoken and lower-resource languages.Pre-trained on 200 languages, with over 100 having more than 1 billion tokens each. Supports 12 languages including Arabic, English, French, German, Hindi, Indonesian, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish, Tagalog, Thai, and Vietnamese. Image understanding is primarily in English.
Coding ProficiencyProficient in coding. Claude 3.5 Sonnet can independently write, edit, and execute code with sophisticated reasoning and troubleshooting capabilities.Understands and generates application code, but coding performance can be inconsistent, struggling with complex or domain-specific problems
Reasoning AbilityStrong reasoning abilities. Claude 3.5 Sonnet sets new industry benchmarks for graduate-level reasoning. Claude Opus 4 excels at advanced coding and delivers sustained performance on long-running tasks.Enhanced reasoning through supervised fine-tuning and online reinforcement learning. Llama 4 Maverick was co-distilled from Llama 4 Behemoth to improve performance on math and reasoning tasks.
Hallucination RateDesigned to reduce hallucinations, but they can still occur. Claude has a relatively low hallucination rate. Internal evaluations have shown that Claude Opus 4 had a higher hallucination rate than Claude 3.7. An ideal hallucination rate for AI-driven sales tools should be less than 5%.Andri.ai reduces hallucinations through direct mapping of questions to verified citations.
Bias and Safety MeasuresBuilt with principles that prioritize user welfare and fairness, incorporating features designed to minimize bias and prevent the generation of harmful content. Uses Constitutional AI, based on a written set of ethical principles.Includes AI safety mechanisms in the model pipeline, uses data filtering and other mitigations during pre-training, employs techniques to ensure models conform to helpful and safe policies during post-training, uses tools like Llama Guard, Prompt Guard, and CyberSecEval, aims to provide unbiased answers and respond to different viewpoints without judgment
API Availability and CostAvailable through the Anthropic API, Amazon Bedrock, and Google Cloud's Vertex AI. Claude 3.5 Sonnet costs $3 per million input tokens and $15 per million output tokens, with a 200K token context window.API costs range from $0.10 to $0.90 per million tokens. Llama 4 Scout: $0.15 input/$0.50 output per 1 million tokens. Cerebras: $0.65 per million input tokens and $0.85 per million output tokens. Llama 4 Maverick: $0.22 input/$0.85 output per 1 million tokens. Meta quotes a blended cost assuming 3 input: 1 output tokens.
Speed of ResponseClaude 3.5 Sonnet operates at twice the speed of Claude 3 Opus.Llama 4 Scout runs at 2,600 tokens per second on Cerebras. Built for speed and has fast response times and low latency.
Availability of Open Source WeightsNot availableMeta refers to its Llama 4 models as open source, though the community license is not an official Open Source Initiative-approved license. Models are freely available for download and use by researchers and developers, but services exceeding 700 million monthly active users require a separate license.

Overall Comparison

Llama 4: Up to 10M context window, pre-trained on 200 languages, API costs from $0.10 to $0.90 per million tokens. Claude 5: Up to 1M context window, supports over 30 languages, Claude 3.5 Sonnet costs $3 input/$15 output per million tokens.

Pros and Cons

Claude 5

Pros:
  • Large context window allows handling of long documents and complex conversations.
  • Well-suited for complex reasoning, coding, and multilingual applications.
  • Robust multilingual capabilities.
  • Proficient at generating and debugging code.
  • Designed to minimize bias and prevent the generation of harmful content.
  • Faster response times (Claude 3.5 Sonnet).
Cons:
  • Potential over-filtering of sensitive content.
  • Occasional over-cautious responses.
  • Hallucinations can still occur.
  • Handling of ambiguous or contradictory information is not specified.

Llama 4

Pros:
  • Large context window allows for multi-document summarization and reasoning over codebases
  • Suited for tasks like native multimodality, content summarization, long-context processing, multilingual tasks, text generation, advanced reasoning, and code generation
  • Better price-performance ratio compared to GPT-4o (Maverick)
  • Fast response times and low latency
Cons:
  • Inconsistent coding performance, struggling with complex or domain-specific problems
  • Potential logical inconsistencies
  • Platform dependence
  • High resource demand
  • Vision understanding focuses on basic properties, text extraction, and simple identification tasks rather than deeper visual comprehension

User Experiences and Feedback