The Apple M4 Ultra is a strong contender for users prioritizing energy efficiency, rendering performance, and a quiet system, particularly within the macOS ecosystem. However, for gamers seeking the highest frequency, the Intel Core i9-15900K might be a better choice, though its specifications are currently unavailable for a thorough comparison.
| Attribute | Apple M4 Ultra | Intel Core i9-15900K |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture (CPU Cores, GPU Cores, Neural Engine) | Up to a 32-core CPU (24 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores), up to an 80-core GPU, and an upgraded Neural Engine. | Not available |
| Clock Speed (Base and Boost) | Base clock frequency of 4520 MHz; Performance cores run at up to 4.4 GHz. | Not available |
| Manufacturing Process (node size) | Second-generation 3-nanometer technology (TSMC's N3E). | Not available |
| Cache Size (L1, L2, L3) | Not available | Not available |
| Memory Support (Type, Speed, Capacity) | Not available | Not available |
| Power Consumption (TDP) | Not available | Not available |
| Integrated Graphics Performance (if applicable) | Not available | Not available |
| Single-Core Performance (benchmark scores) | Not available | Not available |
| Multi-Core Performance (benchmark scores) | Not available | Not available |
| AI/ML Performance (Neural Engine/AI Accelerator) | Not available | Not available |
| Compatibility (Motherboard/System) | Not available | Not available |
| Price | Apple M4 Ultra (Mac Studio) 250 000 (currency not specified) | Not available |
| Pros | Best in rendering due to optimization, Energy efficient, Takes less logic size on chip, Less expensive, Good for a quiet system without overheating, More energy efficient than x86 (CISC) processors, Leaves more room for other accelerators. | Not available |
| Cons | Intel Core i9-15900K is better for gamers with the highest frequency. | Not available |