Compare Products, Services & More

Hardware manufacturers: Apple M4 Ultra vs. Intel Core i9-15900K

Quick Verdict

The Apple M4 Ultra is a strong contender for professional rendering and tasks benefiting from its Neural Engine and power efficiency. The Intel Core i9-15900K remains a solid choice for gaming and AI-intensive applications, despite its higher power consumption and cooling needs. The choice depends on the primary use case and priorities.

Key features – Side-by-Side

AttributeApple M4 UltraIntel Core i9-15900K
NameApple M4 UltraIntel Core i9-15900K
ArchitectureCPU: 32 Cores (24 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores), GPU: 80-core integrated GPU, Neural Engine: 16-core Neural Engine8 Performance-cores (P-cores) and 16 Efficiency-cores (E-cores), Lion Cove and Skymont architectures for P-cores and E-cores, respectively, Xe-LPG architecture with 64 Execution Units (EUs), 4th generation AI acceleration
Clock Speed (Base and Boost)Base Frequency (Performance Cores): 4.52 GHz, Base Frequency (Efficiency Cores): 2.89 GHzP-cores boost up to 5.8 GHz (estimated), E-cores boost up to 4.4 GHz (estimated)
Manufacturing Process (nm)3nmIntel's 20A process node for the CPU cores, TSMC's 3nm process for the integrated GPU
Cache (L1, L2, L3)Not specified in the provided context.L2 Cache: 20MB for P-cores and 16MB for E-cores, L3 Cache: 36MB
Integrated Graphics PerformanceApple M4 Ultra GPU (80-core), GPU Base Clock: 500 MHz, Estimated Compute Power: 36.9 TFLOPSi9-15900K achieves 240+ FPS at 1440p and 180+ FPS at 4K in games
Memory SupportType: LPDDR5X-8533, Maximum Capacity: 192 GBDDR5, DDR5-6400, 2 Channels
Power Consumption (TDP)Not specified in the provided context.TDP (PL1): 125W, Maximum Power Consumption (PL2): 177W
Thermal Design (Cooling Requirements)Advanced cooling solutions may be required to handle the heat generated by the M4 Ultra chip.Advanced cooling solutions may be needed to prevent thermal throttling, average temperature of 85 C
CompatibilityMotherboard Socket: Apple M-Socket, Operating System: macOSMotherboard Socket: LGA1851
PriceNot officially announced.80,000 rubles
AvailabilityExpected in 2025, potentially debuting in Mac Studio and Mac Pro.Not available
Single-Core Performance (Benchmark Scores)Cinebench R23 (Single-Core): 2199, Geekbench 6 (Single-Core): 4062Not available
Multi-Core Performance (Benchmark Scores)Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core): 44781, Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core): 32871Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core): 43118
Rendering PerformanceCompletes Blender tasks in 95 seconds, 4K rendering in Adobe Premiere in 160 seconds.Completes Blender tasks in 125 seconds, 4K rendering in Adobe Premiere in 180 seconds.
Gaming PerformanceReaches 180+ FPS at 1440p and 140+ FPS at 4KAchieves 240+ FPS at 1440p and 180+ FPS at 4K

Overall Comparison

Apple M4 Ultra: Cinebench R23 Multi-Core: 44781, Intel Core i9-15900K: 240+ FPS at 1440p

Pros and Cons

Apple M4 Ultra

Pros:
  • Excels in rendering tasks due to optimization
  • Significantly lower power consumption (60W) compared to Intel Core i9-15900K (175W)
  • Upgraded Neural Engine enhances machine learning processing for tasks like image recognition and natural language processing
Cons:
  • Intel Core i9-15900K is better for gaming due to its higher frequency
  • Requires advanced cooling solutions to handle heat

Intel Core i9-15900K

Pros:
  • Good single-threaded performance
  • Strong choice for gaming and AI
Cons:
  • 7% performance deficit compared to AMD's Ryzen 9 9950X in Cinebench R23 multi-core benchmark
  • Advanced cooling solutions may be needed to prevent thermal throttling
  • Higher power consumption compared to alternatives (175W vs 60W of Apple M4 Ultra)

User Experiences and Feedback