AI-Powered Universal Comparison Engine

Footwear: ON Cloudmonster 2 vs. Nike Air Max Dn

Quick Verdict

The ON Cloudmonster 2 is a versatile running shoe suitable for various training types, offering good cushioning and traction. The Nike Air Max Dn, on the other hand, is designed for casual wear, prioritizing style and comfort with responsive cushioning. The choice depends on the intended use: running performance versus lifestyle.

Key features – Side-by-Side

AttributeON Cloudmonster 2Nike Air Max Dn
NameON Cloudmonster 2Nike Air Max Dn
Weight (oz)Men's: 10.2, 10.3, 10.4. Women's: 8.113.1 oz / 370.0g
Heel-to-toe drop (mm)615.8 mm
Cushioning technologyDual-density Helion superfoam, CloudTec technology with signature hollow pods, Nylon SpeedboardDynamic Air, featuring a dual-chamber, four-tubed Nike Air unit with two sets of dual-pressure tubes (back: 15 psi, front: 5 psi), injected Phylon foam
Upper materialEngineered mesh (92% Recycled Polyester)Multi-layered mesh with a haptic print, some versions have silicon ridges
Outsole materialCarbon rubber in high-wear areas, Rubber pads added to some cloudsRubber, some versions use recycled rubber, reimagined waffle tread
BreathabilityBreathable, but not optimalBreathable upper mesh, 5/5 rating in breathability tests
DurabilityGoodHigh-quality and durable materials from collar to outsole
Stability featuresWider forefoot, Firmer midsole, Nylon Speedboard, Sidewalls in the heel and midfootTPU shank arch clip for midfoot support, TPU heel counter for Achilles support
ResponsivenessBalanced and responsiveDynamic Air technology provides high energy return
Best forDaily training, Long runs, Tempo runsLifestyle/casual wear, inspired by running
Arch supportSuitable for neutral runnersPhylon midsoles mold to the foot for personalized arch support
Water resistanceReliable traction on roads in dry and damp conditionsNot available
PriceNot availableNot available
Pros
  • Adequate cushioning for long-distance runs
  • Commendable traction and durability on various terrains
  • Sturdy outsole
  • Very comfortable
  • Reliable grip in wet conditions
  • Breathable upper
  • Durable materials
  • Good grip and stability on various surfaces
  • Responsive cushioning
  • Comfortable for all-day wear
Cons
  • Not optimal breathability
  • May feel warm in warm temperatures
  • Heel collar rubbed some testers ankle bone
  • Cushioning may feel firmer in the heel for some
  • Average support and stability

Overall Comparison

ON Cloudmonster 2: Weight ~8.1-10.4 oz, Drop 6mm. Nike Air Max Dn: Weight 13.1 oz, Drop 15.8mm.

Pros and Cons

ON Cloudmonster 2

Pros:
  • Adequate cushioning for long-distance runs
  • Commendable traction and durability on various terrains
  • Sturdy outsole
  • Very comfortable
  • Reliable grip in wet conditions
Cons:
  • Not optimal breathability
  • May feel warm in warm temperatures
  • Heel collar rubbed some testers ankle bone

Nike Air Max Dn

Pros:
  • Breathable upper
  • Durable materials
  • Good grip and stability on various surfaces
  • Responsive cushioning
  • Comfortable for all-day wear
Cons:
  • Cushioning may feel firmer in the heel for some
  • Average support and stability

User Experiences and Feedback