Compare Products, Services & More

Footwear: ASICS GEL-Kayano 31 vs. Veja Campo

Quick Verdict

ASICS GEL-Kayano 31 is ideal for runners needing stability and cushioning, while Veja Campo is a stylish and sustainable choice for casual wear.

Comparison of FootwearASICS GEL-Kayano 31 vs. Veja Campo

Key features – Side-by-Side

AttributeASICS GEL-Kayano 31Veja Campo
StabilityDesigned for stability runners, 4D Guidance SystemLow to the ground and stable
Cushioning TechnologyFlyteFoam Blast + and PureGELNot available
Upper MaterialEngineered meshLeather upper (some ChromeFree)
Outsole DurabilityHybrid ASICSGRIP™ outsoleExcellent
WeightMen's: 10.7 oz (305g), Women's: 9.3 oz (266g)Around 14.5 oz (411g)
BreathabilityEngineered mesh, some find it less ventilatedLow (2/5)
Arch SupportDesigned for overpronation, 4D Guidance SystemModerate
Vegan-FriendlyYesTypically made with leather, check for vegan models
Sustainability PracticesFF BLAST™ PLUS ECO, solution dyeingSustainable materials and manufacturing, Certified B Corporation
Intended UseStability running shoeCasual sneaker

Overall Comparison

Stability: ASICS wins; Cushioning: ASICS wins; Sustainability: Both strong; Intended Use: Different

Pros and Cons

ASICS GEL-Kayano 31

Pros:
  • Advanced stability features with 4D Guidance System
  • FlyteFoam Blast + and PureGEL cushioning for balance and responsiveness
  • Durable Hybrid ASICSGRIP™ outsole
  • Vegan-friendly materials
  • Sustainable practices including recycled materials and solution dyeing
  • Available in wide and extra-wide sizes
Cons:
  • Some runners find the new upper material feels thicker and less ventilated than previous models
  • Heavier, which can affect performance during faster runs

Veja Campo

Pros:
  • Stable
  • Durable outsole
  • Sustainable materials and practices
  • Clean, minimalist aesthetic
  • Suitable for dressing up or down
  • Wider toe box
Cons:
  • Low breathability
  • Typically not vegan-friendly
  • Moderate arch support

User Experiences and Feedback