Compare Products, Services & More

Development tools: Pulumi 5.0 vs. AWS Cloud9 IDE

Quick Verdict

Pulumi is better for multi-cloud infrastructure management, while AWS Cloud9 excels as a collaborative, AWS-centric IDE.

Comparison of Development toolsPulumi 5.0 vs. AWS Cloud9 IDE

Key features – Side-by-Side

AttributePulumi 5.0AWS Cloud9 IDE
Infrastructure as Code (IaC) SupportYesYes
Supported Programming LanguagesTypeScript, Python, Go, Java, C#Over 40, including JavaScript, Python, PHP, Ruby, Go, and C++
Cloud Provider SupportAWS, Azure, Google Cloud, KubernetesTightly integrated with AWS
State ManagementAutomaticNot applicable
PricingFree tier available; paid tiers based on resource hoursNo additional charge, pay for underlying AWS resources
Collaboration FeaturesSecure collaboration, CI/CD integrationReal-time collaborative coding, shared editing, shared terminal sessions, built-in chat

Overall Comparison

IaC: Both; Languages: Cloud9 supports more; Cloud: Pulumi multi-cloud, Cloud9 AWS-centric; State: Pulumi automates

Pros and Cons

Pulumi 5.0

Pros:
  • Infrastructure as Code (IaC) Support
  • Supports TypeScript, Python, Go, Java, and C#
  • Supports AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Kubernetes, and other packages
  • Offers automatic state management
  • Integrates with various CI/CD tools, including GitHub Actions
  • Allows you to leverage existing skills and integrate infrastructure code with application code
  • Open source community support and documentation
Cons:
  • No major disadvantages reported.

AWS Cloud9 IDE

Pros:
  • Cloud-based IDE
  • Supports Infrastructure as Code (IaC)
  • Supports over 40 programming languages
  • Tightly integrated with AWS
  • Integrated debugger
  • Code hinting and autocompletion
  • Real-time collaborative coding
  • Shared editing and terminal sessions
  • Built-in chat
  • Integrates with AWS CodeStar and AWS Lambda
  • Live syntax checking
  • Built-in Git integration
  • Customization options for themes and key bindings
  • Documentation, live online sessions, videos, and webinars support
Cons:
  • User's responsibility to maintain backups
  • Limited plugin support

User Experiences and Feedback