AI-Powered Universal Comparison Engine

Computer hardware: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X vs. Samsung 990 PRO 4TB

Quick Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X and Samsung 990 PRO 4TB serve different purposes in a computer system. The 9950X is a powerful CPU for processing tasks, while the 990 PRO 4TB is a high-speed storage solution. Choosing between them depends on whether you need improved processing power or faster storage capabilities.

Key features – Side-by-Side

AttributeAMD Ryzen 9 9950XSamsung 990 PRO 4TB
NameAMD Ryzen 9 9950XSamsung 990 PRO 4TB
CPU Core Count16 cores / 32 threadsNot available
CPU Clock Speed (Base/Boost)4.3 GHz base, up to 5.7 GHz boostNot available
CPU TDP170WNot available
CPU ArchitectureZen 5 (Granite Ridge)Not available
CPU Integrated GraphicsRadeon GraphicsNot available
Storage CapacityNot available4TB
Storage InterfaceNot availablePCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0
Storage Read SpeedNot availableUp to 7,450 MB/s
Storage Write SpeedNot availableUp to 6,900 MB/s
Storage TBW (Terabytes Written)Not available2,400 TB
Storage Form FactorNot availableM.2 2280
Storage ControllerNot availableSamsung Pascal (S4LV008)
PriceNot availableNot available
RatingsNot availableNot available

Overall Comparison

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X: 16 cores/32 threads, 4.3 GHz base, 5.7 GHz boost, 170W TDP. Samsung 990 PRO 4TB: 4TB capacity, 7,450 MB/s read, 6,900 MB/s write, 2,400 TBW.

Pros and Cons

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X

Pros:
  • Significant gains in single- and multi-threaded productivity applications
  • Unlocked for overclocking
Cons:
  • Modest multi-core performance improvement over 7950X
  • Requires top-notch cooling

Samsung 990 PRO 4TB

Pros:
  • Faster game loading times compared to previous generation SSDs
  • More than 55% improvement in random performance compared to the 980 PRO
  • Fast boot-up times
  • Stable and consistent boot drive
Cons:
  • Real-world read/write speeds may be slightly lower than advertised
  • Write speeds may drop to around 1600 MB/s once the pseudo-SLC cache is full
  • Operates at reduced speeds when backward compatible with PCIe 3.0

User Experiences and Feedback