AI-Powered Universal Comparison Engine

Ai-powered tools: Claude 4 vs. GPT-5

Quick Verdict

GPT-5 is expected to offer significant improvements over Claude 4 in terms of context window size, reasoning accuracy, code generation, hallucination rate, and bias mitigation. However, Claude 4 is currently available and has a clearly defined pricing model, while GPT-5's availability and pricing are still uncertain. The choice between the two depends on specific needs and priorities, such as the importance of a large context window versus immediate availability and transparent pricing.

Key features – Side-by-Side

AttributeClaude 4GPT-5
Context Window Size (Token Limit)Up to 200,000 tokens, with Enterprise plans for Claude Sonnet 4 having access to a 500k context window.Rumored to be up to 1 million tokens, with some experts predicting over 1 million tokens and mentions of up to 5 million tokens.
Multimodal Input Capabilities (Image, Audio, Video)Understands and generates from text, images, and audio.Expected to natively support text, image, audio, and voice, with a possibility of video processing being added. Designed to unify reasoning, multimodal input, and task execution in a single model.
Reasoning and Problem-Solving Accuracy (Benchmark Scores)Outperforms GPT-4 and Gemini 1.5 Pro in reasoning, knowledge, and code generation. Strong performance on SWE-bench, TerminalBench, GPQA Diamond, TAU-bench, and MMLU.Expected to integrate multiple architectures for improved reasoning. An experimental LLM achieved gold medal-level performance at the 2025 International Math Olympiad (IMO). Projected to score over 95% on the MMLU benchmark, compared to GPT-4's 86.4%.
Coding Proficiency (Languages Supported, Code Generation Accuracy)Supports Python, JavaScript, Go, Rust, and more. Performs code refactoring, debugging, and code review. Claude Opus 4 is considered the best coding model.Expected to show stronger reasoning and chain-of-thought capabilities, leading to more accurate math and better code generation. Expected to achieve 90%+ accuracy on HumanEval compared to GPT-4's 74%.
Hallucination Rate (Frequency of Incorrect/Nonsensical Outputs)65% less likely to engage in shortcut behavior.Designed for significantly fewer hallucinations compared to earlier models. Expected to show improved factual accuracy across domains due to more robust training on structured data and enhanced retrieval abilities.
Bias Mitigation (Fairness Across Demographics)Built on Anthropic's Constitutional AI framework, trained to be useful, friendly, and truthful.Expected to leverage enhanced reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) and better safety fine-tuning, making it more resistant to harmful or biased content.
Customization Options (Fine-tuning, API Access)Accessible via the Anthropic API, GitHub Copilot, AWS Bedrock, and Google Cloud's Vertex AI. Fine-tuning on specific datasets is an area for improvement.Likely to have different intelligence levels or versions, with advanced capabilities accessible for pro/enterprise subscribers.
Data Privacy and Security ComplianceStrict data privacy policies to ensure user data is handled ethically and securely.OpenAI supports customers' compliance with privacy laws, including GDPR and CCPA. OpenAI offers a Data Processing Addendum for customers.
Integration Capabilities (Plugins, Third-party Services)Supports tool use and extended workflows through its API. Connects to APIs and file systems using the Model Context Protocol (MCP).Expected to integrate more deeply into workflows, performing tasks like travel booking and workflow management.
Speed and Latency (Response Time)Claude Sonnet 4 has lower inference times. Claude Opus 4 offers hybrid reasoning with both near-instant responses and extended thinking.Aims to merge the speed of the 'o-series' with the deep chain-of-thought reasoning, delivering a single model that automatically selects the right capability for each request.
Pricing Model and Cost-EffectivenessClaude Opus 4: $15 per million input tokens and $75 per million output tokens. Claude Sonnet 4: $3 per million input tokens, $15 per million output tokens. Claude Pro plan: $17 per month.As newer models emerge, a reduction in the cost of using the OpenAI API is anticipated.
Availability and Reliability (Uptime)Available on the web, iOS, and Android, and through the Anthropic API, Amazon Bedrock, and Google Cloud's Vertex AI.Will first be available to paying Plus, Team, Education, and Enterprise users, followed by a gradual rollout to free users as infrastructure scales and risk evaluations are complete.

Overall Comparison

GPT-5 projected MMLU score: >95% vs GPT-4's 86.4%. GPT-5 expected HumanEval accuracy: 90%+ vs GPT-4's 74%. Claude 4 context window: Up to 500k tokens (Enterprise Sonnet 4). Claude Opus 4 pricing: $15/$75 per million input/output tokens. Claude Sonnet 4 pricing: $3/$15 per million input/output tokens.

Pros and Cons

Claude 4

Pros:
  • Large context window (up to 200,000 tokens, 500k for Enterprise Sonnet 4)
  • Multimodal input capabilities (image, audio, video)
  • Strong reasoning and problem-solving accuracy
  • Excellent coding proficiency with multiple languages supported
  • Lower hallucination rate compared to previous models
  • Built on Constitutional AI framework for fairness and truthfulness
  • Integration capabilities with various platforms and services
  • Fast response times with Claude Sonnet 4
  • Hybrid reasoning with Claude Opus 4 for instant or extended thinking
Cons:
  • Fine-tuning on specific datasets is an area for improvement

GPT-5

Pros:
  • Larger context window for handling complex tasks and maintaining coherence.
  • Native support for text, image, audio, and voice inputs.
  • Improved reasoning and problem-solving capabilities.
  • More accurate code generation.
  • Significantly reduced hallucination rate.
  • Enhanced bias mitigation techniques.
  • Deeper integration into workflows with plugins and third-party services.
  • Faster response time by merging speed and reasoning capabilities.
Cons:
  • Information largely based on speculation and leaks.
  • Specific programming languages supported not officially detailed.
  • Availability will be gradual, starting with paying users.
  • Pricing model is not yet defined, but a reduction in API cost is anticipated.

User Experiences and Feedback