Both Amazon's AWS AI & ML Ethics Policy and Meta's Responsible AI Program demonstrate a commitment to ethical AI development. AWS offers more concrete tools and certifications, while Meta focuses on open-source contributions and external collaboration. Meta's approach to data privacy raises some concerns regarding user control and transparency compared to AWS.
Attribute | Amazon's AWS AI & ML Ethics Policy | Meta's Responsible AI Program |
---|---|---|
Transparency of AI ethics guidelines | AWS enhances transparency through AI Service Cards, providing information on intended use cases, limitations, design choices, and best practices. AWS also shares information on how they address responsible AI dimensions during service development. | Meta emphasizes transparency and control, aiming to provide users with a deeper understanding of their data relationships and more control. Critics find data policy shifts vague, communication lacking, and the opt-out process poorly designed. |
Scope of ethical considerations | AWS's responsible AI framework covers fairness, explainability, privacy and security, safety, controllability, veracity and robustness, governance, and transparency. | Considers fairness and inclusion, robustness and safety, privacy and security, transparency and control, and mechanisms for governance and accountability. Addresses issues like bias in AI systems, aiming for equitable treatment across diverse communities. |
Accountability mechanisms for ethical breaches | AWS may investigate and enforce violations of its AI policy as noted in the AWS Acceptable Use Policy. | Emphasizes clear responsibility and review processes for AI initiatives, with escalation processes for ethical concerns. Has clear responsibility assignments, review processes, and governance structures for AI systems, and incident management protocols. |
Availability of tools for ethical AI development | AWS provides tools such as Amazon SageMaker Clarify for bias detection and explainability. Amazon Bedrock Guardrails helps implement safeguards tailored to AI applications. | Meta has open-sourced code and datasets for tasks like machine translation and fairness evaluation. They also contribute to AI developer infrastructure with tools like PyTorch. They provide resources for developers, outlining best practices and considerations for building responsibly with Large Language Models (LLMs). |
Training programs on AI ethics for employees | Amazon provides training to employees on topics covered within the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, including how to submit anonymous complaints to Amazon's third-party Ethics Hotline. MLU is an initiative to help Amazon employees gain skills in machine learning. | While specific details are not available, Meta has a cross-disciplinary team dedicated to Responsible AI. |
External audits and certifications | AWS has achieved ISO/IEC 42001 certification, an international standard for AI management systems, covering services like Amazon Bedrock, Textract, and Transcribe. | Meta collaborates with external auditors and experts to improve fairness and performance. They also make generative AI features available to security researchers through a bug bounty program. |
Community engagement and feedback mechanisms | Amazon engages with the community and incorporates feedback through various channels, including AI Service Cards that enable user feedback. | Meta values user feedback for continuous improvement of AI models and automatic detection of policy violations. They also engage with civil rights advocates, human rights groups, and AI experts. |
Integration of ethics into the AI development lifecycle | AWS integrates responsible AI principles throughout the AI development lifecycle, from design to deployment. | Meta emphasizes a layered approach to model safety, empowering developers to make decisions about balancing trade-offs throughout the product development cycle. Ethics are integrated into data handling, design, development, and deployment of AI technologies. |
Specific policies addressing AI bias and fairness | Amazon SageMaker Clarify detects and measures potential bias. AWS also emphasizes the importance of diverse and representative data collection to mitigate bias in AI algorithms. | Meta aims to reduce inherent AI biases and promote more neutral and balanced performance across political and social issues. They have implemented a Variance Reduction System (VRS) to reduce bias based on sex and race/ethnicity in housing ads. Policies prohibit advertisers from using ad products to discriminate. |
Data governance and privacy policies related to AI | AWS AI/ML services prioritize privacy and ethical standards, offering data anonymization, secure environments, and compliance controls. | Meta has a new AI privacy policy that allows them to use public posts for AI training. Users can object to this use of their data, but the process is complex. Meta also uses Essential Data about your AI Glasses to ensure they work as expected. AI systems process publicly visible content and behavioral data. They require users to opt out if they don't want their data used for AI training. |
Mechanisms for human oversight and control | AWS requires human oversight and rigorous testing for consequential AI decisions impacting health, rights, or safety. They encourage a 'human-in-the-loop' approach. | Meta designs AI systems for human oversight, integrating mechanisms that allow humans to monitor, understand, and intervene in AI decisions. |
Methods for evaluating the societal impact of AI systems | AWS emphasizes the importance of considering the broader impact of AI systems on society, employment, and other factors. | Meta uses impact assessments to evaluate potential system effects. They also consider ethical evaluations, multi-stakeholder approaches, and long-term considerations in AI development. Uses impact assessment methodologies and ethical evaluation procedures. They also consider multi-stakeholder engagement and long-term implications. |
Price | Not available | Not available |
Ratings | Not available | Not available |